What are the differences between a Blitz and meetings?

More and more study and work is done by groups and teams.

Historically the two primary tools used by groups are meetings and brainstorming.

Perhaps it is time to develop a 3rd alternative.

Introducing Ideas Blitz.

Here is how it compares with meetings.

A Blitz is 2 to 20 minutes; a meeting usually 1 hour.

A Blitz is 6 people or less; a meeting can be anything up to 30 people.

A Blitz has a single focus or challenge; a meeting has a multiple agenda.

A Blitz can be called by anyone, at any time on any issue; a meeting is usually called by a senior person.

A Blitz Leader retains full responsibility; a meeting everyone seems to be accountable (but as a result no-none is).

A Blitz works from the individual up; a meeting works from the top down.

A Blitz can be held anywhere; a meeting in formal meeting rooms.

A Blitz operates at the edge of chaos; a meeting follows a formal structure.

A Blitz is highly energizing; a meeting can sometimes suck the energy from the room.

A Blitz and a meeting are two different tools that are suited for different purposes, much like a hammer and a spade are used for a specific requirement.

Together they form a more complete tool kit.

A Blitz does not replace a meeting but complements it.

In fact, we have found that depending on the purpose an Ideas Blitz can decrease the time spent in meetings.

If your group or team needs to solve a problem quickly or generate an idea or make a decision than a Blitz is an ideal choice.

It can lead to more productivity, innovation and engagement.

A Blitz gives you more choice and leads to better, faster results.

Happy Blitzing.

Comments are closed.